HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"count": 1648,
"next": "https://blogs.legistify.com/news/?format=api&page=2",
"previous": null,
"results": [
{
"id": 2587,
"mtag_name": "Alternate Dispute Resolution",
"title": "Arbitration Award Must Be Served to Party and Not Agent or Advocate",
"description": "Recently, the Delhi High Court has held that for a valid delivery of an Arbitral Award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the service of the award must be directly addressed to the relevant party and not to their agents or advocates.",
"image": "https://blogs.legistify.com/media/blogs/gavel-with-books-old-wooden-desk_2_lFMcpMw.jpg",
"imagealt": "Arbitration Award Must Be Served to Party and Not Agent or Advocate",
"slug": "arbitration-award-must-be-served-to-party-not-agent-or-advocate"
},
{
"id": 2584,
"mtag_name": "IPR Management",
"title": "Bombay High Court Declines to Vacate Ex Parte Injunction against KLF Nirmal Industries for its Blue Bottle Similar to Parachute Hair Oil",
"description": "The Bombay High Court recently declined to revoke its ex-parte ruling that prevented KLF Nirmal Industries from using blue packaging and label for its coconut oil products, which were found to be deceptively similar to Parachute Coconut Oil.",
"image": "https://blogs.legistify.com/media/blogs/1638849776065.jpeg",
"imagealt": "Bombay High Court Declines to Vacate Ex Parte Injunction against KLF Nirmal Industries for its Blue Bottle Similar to Parachute Hair Oil",
"slug": "bombay-high-court-declines-to-vacate-ex-parte-injunction-against-klf-nirmal-industries-for-its-blue-bottle-cimilar-to-parachute"
},
{
"id": 2583,
"mtag_name": "Alternate Dispute Resolution",
"title": "One Partner of the Firm Cannot Refer Dispute to Arbitration in Absence of the Others",
"description": "The Bombay High Court has ruled that a partner cannot refer a dispute relating to the business of a firm to arbitration in the absence of other partners.",
"image": "https://blogs.legistify.com/media/blogs/gavel-with-books-old-wooden-desk_2.jpg",
"imagealt": "One Partner of the Firm Cannot Refer Dispute to Arbitration in Absence of the Others",
"slug": "one-partner-cannot-refer-dispute-to-arbitration-in-absence-of-others"
},
{
"id": 2580,
"mtag_name": "IPR Management",
"title": "Use of Trademark as Keywords in Google Ads Program not Infringement",
"description": "The Delhi High Court ruled that the use of trademarks as keywords in the Google Ads program, without causing any confusion or unfair advantage, does not constitute infringement.",
"image": "https://blogs.legistify.com/media/blogs/businesspeople-working-finance-accounting-analyze-financi.jpg",
"imagealt": "Use of Trademark as Keywords in Google Ads Program not Infringement",
"slug": "use-of-trademark-as-keywords-in-google-ads-program-not-infringement"
},
{
"id": 2579,
"mtag_name": "General Legal",
"title": "Convenience of Parties Not the Ony Benchmark to Determine Jurisdiction in Light of Advent of Technology",
"description": "The Delhi High Court has stated that, with the advent of technology, it is no longer appropriate to consider only the parties’ convenience when determining jurisdiction.",
"image": "https://blogs.legistify.com/media/blogs/laptop-mallet-table.jpg",
"imagealt": "Convenience of Parties Not the Ony Benchmark to Determine Jurisdiction in Light of Advent of Technology",
"slug": "convenience-of-parties-not-the-only-benchmark-to-determine-jurisdiction-in-light-of-technology"
},
{
"id": 2577,
"mtag_name": "General Legal",
"title": "Criminal Law Bills Replacing the IPC, CrPC, and Evidence Act Receive Presidential Assent",
"description": "The President of India has given her assent to three criminal law bills that were recently passed by the parliament",
"image": "https://blogs.legistify.com/media/blogs/gavel-with-books-old-wooden-desk.jpg",
"imagealt": "Criminal Law Bills Replacing the IPC, CrPC, and Evidence Act Receive Presidential Assent",
"slug": "criminal-law-bills-replacing-the-ipc-crpc-and-evidence-act-receive-predential-assent"
},
{
"id": 2576,
"mtag_name": "General Legal",
"title": "Parties Cannot Give Undertakings During Court Proceedings Without the Intent to Fulfil Them",
"description": "According to a recent observation by the Delhi High Court while dealing with a Contempt Petition, parties involved in legal proceedings should not undertake their commitments lightly.",
"image": "https://blogs.legistify.com/media/blogs/wooden-gavel-books-wooden-table.jpg",
"imagealt": "Parties Cannot Give Undertakings During Court Proceedings Without the Intent to Fulfil Them",
"slug": "parties-cannot-give-undertakings-during-court-proceedings-without-the-intent-to-fulfil-them"
},
{
"id": 2573,
"mtag_name": "IPR Management",
"title": "Burger King Declared as a Well-Known Trademark by Delhi High Court",
"description": "The Delhi High Court has granted the status of a 'well-known mark' to Burger King Company LLC based on its long usage, extensive operations, and global reputation.",
"image": "https://blogs.legistify.com/media/blogs/Burger-King-Menu-1024x605.jpg",
"imagealt": "Burger King Declared as a Well-Known Trademark by Delhi High Court",
"slug": "burger-king-declared-as-a-well-known-trademark-by-delhi-high-court"
},
{
"id": 2571,
"mtag_name": "General Legal",
"title": "Principle Of 'Reasonable Time' Applies When No Limitation Period Is Specified, Says Supreme Court of India",
"description": "The Supreme Court of India recently ruled that the principle of 'reasonable time' will apply when no time limit is prescribed.",
"image": "https://blogs.legistify.com/media/blogs/Supreme-Court-of-India_pj6SeLC.jpg",
"imagealt": "Principle Of 'Reasonable Time' Applies When No Limitation Period Is Specified, Says Supreme Court of India",
"slug": "principle-of-reasonable-time-applies-when-no-limitation-period-is-specified"
},
{
"id": 2569,
"mtag_name": "Litigation Management",
"title": "Unchallenged Conviction under Section 138 of NI Act Bars Managing Partner from Challenging Trial Court's Findings",
"description": "The Kerala High Court recently ruled that if a partnership firm has not challenged a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, then the managing partner of the firm cannot challenge the findings of the trial court in a cheque bounce case.",
"image": "https://blogs.legistify.com/media/blogs/closeup-shot-person-holding-gavel-tabl.jpg",
"imagealt": "Unchallenged Conviction under Section 138 of NI Act Bars Managing Partner from Challenging Trial Court's Findings",
"slug": "unchallenged-conviction-under-section-138-of-ni-act-bars-managing-partner-from-challenging-trial-court-findings"
}
]
}
